Radio Receiver Architectures
The radio receiver is designed to receive radio signals. How it does that job depends on the receiver architecture. That is what this chapter is all about. But first, before covering receiver architectures, I discuss a little about the basic problem of radio reception: separating signals from noise.
SIGNALS, NOISE, AND RECEPTION
No matter how simple or fancy the system
may be, the basic function of a radio receiver is the same: to distinguish signals
from noise. The concept of “noise” covers
both human-made and natural radio frequency signals. Human-made signals include all signals in the pass band other than
the one being sought.
In communications systems, the signal
is some form of modulated (AM, FM, PM,
on-off telegraphy, etc.) periodic sine wave
propagating as an electromagnetic (i.e., radio) wave. The noise, on the other hand,
may be a random signal that sounds like the
“hiss” heard between stations on a radio.
The spectrum of such noise signals appears
to be Gaussian (“white noise”) or pseudogaussian (“pink noise,” or bandwidth limited noise).
Thermal Noise
Every electronic system (even a simple resistor) generates thermal noise, even if no
power is flowing through it. One goal of the
system designer is to minimize the noise
added by the system, so that weaker signals
are not obscured. A basic form of noise seen
in systems is thermal noise. Even if the amplifiers in the receiver add no additional noise (they will), thermal noise will be found
at the input due to the input resistance.
If you replace the antenna with a resistor
matched to the system impedance and totally
shielded, noise still will be present. The noise
is produced by the random motion of electrons inside the resistor. At all temperatures
above absolute zero (about −273.16ÂșC), the
electrons in the resistor material are in random
motion. At any given instant, a huge number
of electrons will be in motion in all directions.
The Reception Problem
Equation 2.2 shows the basic problem of radio reception, especially in cases where the
signal is very weak. The signal in Figure 2.2A
is embedded in noise of relatively high amplitude. This signal is lower than the noise
level, so it is very difficult (perhaps impossible) to detect. The signal in Figure 2.2B is
easily detectable because the signal amplitude is higher than the noise amplitude.
Detection becomes difficult when the signal
is only slightly stronger than the average
noise power level.
How high an SNR is required depends
on a lot of subjective factors when a human
listener is present. Skilled radio operators can detect signals with an SNR of less than 1 dB—
but the rest of us cannot even hear that signal. Most radio operators can detect 3 dB SNR
signals, but for “comfortable” listening, a 10
dB SNR usually is specified. For digital systems, the noise performance usually is defined by the acceptable bit error rate (BER).
Strategies
A number of strategies can be used to improve the SNR of a system. First, of course, is
to buy a receiver that has a low internal
“noise floor” and do nothing to upset that figure. High-quality receivers have very low
noise, but sometimes some creative spec
writing in the advertisements uses different
bandwidths for the measurement, and only
the most favorable value—which may not be
the bandwidth that matches your needs—is
reported.
By common sense, we see that there
are two approaches to SNR improvement: either increase the signal amplitude or decrease the noise amplitude. Most successful
systems do both, but they must be done
carefully.
One approach to SNR improvement is
to use a preamplifier ahead of the receiver
antenna terminals. This approach may or
may not work and under some situations
may make the situation worse. The problem is that the preamplifier adds noise of its own
and will amplify noise from outside (received
through the antenna) and the desired signal
equally. If you have an amplifier with a gain
of, say, 20 dB, then the external noise and
the signal both are increased by 20 dB. The
result is that the absolute numbers are bigger
but the SNR is the same. If the amplifier produces any significant noise of its own, then
the SNR will degrade. The key is to use a
very low-noise amplifier (LNA) for the preamplifier. Using an LNA for the preamplifier
may actually reduce the noise figure of the
receiver system.
Another trick is to use a preselector
ahead of the receiver. A preselector is either a tuned circuit or a bandpass filter
placed in the antenna transmission line
ahead of the receiver antenna terminals. A
passive preselector has no amplification
(uses L-C elements only), while an active
preselector has a built-in amplifier. The amplifier should be an LNA type. The preselector can improve the system because it
amplifies the signal by a fixed amount, but
only the noise within the passband is amplified the same amount as the signal.
Improvement comes from bandwidth limiting the noise but not the signal.
Yet another practical approach is to use
a directional antenna. This method works especially well when the unwanted noise is
other human-made signal sources. An omnidirectional antenna receives equally well in
all directions. As a result, both natural and
human-made external noise sources operating within the receiver’s passband will be
picked up. But if the antenna is made highly
directional, then all noise sources not in the
direction of interest are suppressed.
Highly directional antennas have gain,
so the signal levels in the direction of interest
are increased. Although the noise also increases in that direction, the rest of the noise
sources (in other directions) are suppressed.
The result is that the SNR is increased by
both methods.
When designing a communications system, the greatest attention usually should be
paid to the antenna, then to an LNA or low noise preselector, and then to the receiver.
Generally speaking, money spent on the antenna gives more signal to noise than the
same money spent on amplifiers and other
attachments.
RADIO RECEIVER ARCHITECTURES
Radio receivers are at the heart of nearly all
communications activities. In this chapter, we
discuss the different types of radio receivers on
the market. We learn how to interpret receiver
specifications in Chapter 3. Later, we look at
specific designs for specific applications.
Origins
The very earliest radio receivers were not receivers at all in the sense we know the term
today. Early experiments by Hertz, Marconi,
and others used spark gaps and regular telegraph instruments of the day. Range was severely limited because those devices have a
terribly low sensitivity to radio waves. Later,
around the turn of the 20th century, a device
called a Branly coherer was used for radio signal detection. This device consisted of a glass
tube filled with iron filings placed in series between the antenna and the ground. Although
considerably better than earlier apparatus, the
coherer was something of a dud for weak signal reception. In the first decade of this century, however, Fleming invented the diode
vacuum tube and Lee DeForest invented the
triode vacuum tube. The latter device made
amplification possible and detection a lot
more efficient.
A receiver must perform two basic functions: (1) It must respond to, detect, and demodulate desired signals; and (2) it must not
respond to, detect, or be adversely affected
by undesired signals. If it fails in either of
these two functions, then the design performs
poorly.
Both functions are necessary. Weakness
in either function makes a receiver a poor
bargain, unless there is some mitigating circumstance. The receiver’s performance specifications tell us how well the manufacturer
